Rep. McDermott sues the University of Hawaii for details of secretive sex survey of school children

State Representative Bob McDermott (40th District—Ewa Beach) filed a lawsuit against the University of Hawaii for denying him access to a Pono Choices survey instrument.  The survey questions contained therein potentially ask 11 year-old students questions about their sexuality and sexual behaviors.

McDermott has taken this action after numerous attempts to obtain this information on behalf of Hawaii parents and taxpayers.
After learning that Pono Choices was a research project, Rep. McDermott sought to obtain a copy of the survey instrument.  The University of Hawaii denied him his request, claiming that “release of the instrument is being withheld in order to prevent disruption of the study”.

Chapter 92F of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, however, states that “All government records are open to public inspection unless access is restricted or closed by law.”  If an agency wishes to deny access to a record, the agency bears the burden of proof of explaining why denial is proper.  Rep. McDermott, however, does not believe the University has adequately met its burden.

“This is a government record”, said McDermott.  “Students have already been given access to the instrument’s contents.  The information has therefore already been released to members of the public.  So it is time for the rest of the public—especially parents—to have access to that same document.  It is nonsensical to allow middle schools access to a government document, but deny it to grown adults.” Rep. McDermott’s legal counsel is former State Senator John Carroll.

“This is very reminiscent of my earlier attempts to get copies of the original Pono Choices curriculum material,” said McDermott. “The DOE and University just don’t seem to understand that parents and taxpayers own these institutions, and are entitled to see what their money is buying — especially when it comes to materials of a very sensitive nature put in front of their children for secretive research activities.”

Rep. McDermott holds the position that the public should have access to what is being taught in public schools.  The University of Hawaii authored Pono Choices, which is a sexual education curriculum designed for 11 to 13 year-old students.  The curriculum is also a human research project.  The Department of Education is utilizing a survey instrument (authored by the University) to ask students intrusive personal questions—presumably some are sexual in nature.  However, we do not know what the exact questions are—since the University of Hawaii is refusing to release the survey instrument.

The Plaintiff is Rep. Bob McDermott.  The lawsuit regarding access to the Pono Choices records is based on Chapter 92F of the Hawaii Revised Statutes.  Under that law, the Defendant would be the “University of Hawaii”, not the State of Hawaii.  HRS §92F-15(a) states: “A person aggrieved by a denial of access to a government record may bring an action against the agency at any time within two years after the agency denial to compel disclosure” (emphasis added).  The term “Agency” under HRS §92F-3 means:
any unit of government in this State, any county, or any combination of counties; department; institution; board; commission; district; council; bureau; office; governing authority; other instrumentality of state or county government; or corporation or other establishment owned, operated, or managed by or on behalf of this State or any county, but does not include the nonadministrative functions of the courts of this State.

While the University of Hawaii is likely to put up a defense, Rep. McDermott will argue:

• Government records are presumed to be subject to disclosure requirements.
• The agency that refuses to disclose information bears the burden of proof of showing why the refusal is proper.
• The University of Hawaii has already “let the cat out of the bag” by allowing the DOE to ask these survey questions of members of the public.
• Given that the survey has already been released to some individuals, other persons have access under the law.

The real question: what is the University of Hawaii afraid of?

Pono Press Con Feb 2015Contact:

Hawaii lawmakers file resolutions seeking Jones Act exemption, and Senate Minority presents Jones Act documentary film to raise public awareness

In a bipartisan effort to positively impact the cost of living for Hawaii residents, several members of the Hawaii Senate and House of Representatives have filed concurrent resolutions seeking an exemption for Hawaii from a provision in the Merchant Marine Act of 1920 (the Jones Act) requiring that all vessels be built in the United States.  The resolutions also ask that Alaska, Guam and Puerto Rico be exempt.

To comply with the Jones Act and engage in coastwise trade between the ports of the United States, a ship must:

1)  fly the U.S. flag;

2)  be built in a U.S. shipyard;

3)  be 75% owned by U.S. citizens; and

4)  be crewed by U.S. citizens or permanent residents.

Proponents of exempting the non-contiguous trades from the second hurdle (the “domestic build requirement”) say it would create a larger market and foster greater competition in ocean shipping for the noncontiguous trades (in addition to having no negative effect on jobs).

This past Friday, Senator Sam Slom filed concurrent resolutions SR10 and SCR34, co-sponsored by Senators Will Espero, Brickwood Galuteria, Breene Harimoto, Clarence Nishihara, Gilbert Keith-Agaran, Lorraine Inouye, Russell Ruderman and Gil Riviere.  The companion resolutions in the House were filed by primary introducers Representatives Sam Kong, Cindy Evans, Lauren Cheape-Matsumoto, Andria Tupola and Gene Ward (HR21 and HCR46).   The resolutions urge Congress to exempt Hawaii and other non-contiguous trades from the domestic build requirement because of its restrictive impact on the market for shipping goods to Hawaii.

Jones Act

Informational briefing of the Jones Act left to right Cliff Slater, Independent Transportation/Trucking/Railroad ,Michael N. Hansen, President, Hawaii Shippers Council; Cliff Slater, Independent Transportation/Trucking/Railroad, Representative Cindy Evans, Senator Sam Slom and Representative Gene Ward.

Senator Sam Slom said, “The Jones Act was originally meant to protect the shipping industry and maritime trade, but almost a century has gone by and it’s easy to see that the law does not serve its original purpose.  Today, the effect of the Jones Act is that people in Hawaii, Alaska, Puerto Rico and Guam pay significantly more than the rest of the country for everyday necessities.  Don’t get fooled though, it is not just these more remote locations as the Jones Act also adds to the cost of goods and oil for lower 48 states.  It is time for our U.S. Congress to address the role that the antiquated Jones Act plays in the high cost of living.  I am grateful that so many of my colleagues in both the Senate and the House see that an exemption to the U.S. build requirement can make a huge difference in what we here in Hawaii pay for goods,.”

Hawaii Shippers Council President Mike Hansen says, “A U.S.-build exemption would allow U.S. ship owners to acquire foreign built ships, register them under the U.S.-flag and operate them in the domestic noncontiguous trades.  The advantage of this reform is new ships built in South Korea and Japan are a fifth the cost of comparable ships built in the U.S., and that dramatically lower capital cost will lead to greater competition and moderate freight costs by lowering barriers to entry and increasing contestability in the shipping market place.”

Dr. Kim Kepner-Sybounmy, Chief of Staff for Senator Slom, is another proponent of Jones Act reform.  She has produced a short documentary film to educate the public about the Jones Act, which will be shown this Friday, February 27, 2015 at 12pm in the Capitol Auditorium.  Members of the media as well as the general public are invited to attend.  The program will begin with an introduction by Senator Slom and Dr. Kepner-Sybounmy, followed by presentation of the film.  The presentation will conclude with a question and answer session.

Dr. Kepner-Sybounmy says, “I was first introduced to the Jones Act about a year ago when I attended the Jones Act Video Conference while working for Senator Slom.   During the video conference I listened to the legislative spokespeople from Alaska and Puerto Rico discuss Jones Act reform, and I began to see the economic struggles Hawaii has in common with these locations.  This movie is the result of my desire to make this complex issue understandable.  On a personal level, like many people in Hawaii, my family is constantly looking long term to decide whether we can afford to retire here.  My concern is that Hawaii, along with the other noncontiguous locations, makes up only 2% of the population of the U.S. yet we shoulder most of the cost burden of the expensive Jones Act ships.  This unnecessary cost is frustrating, and it makes you wonder how many new businesses are never started and how many existing businesses are prevented from expanding due to the high costs for shipping as a result of the Jones Act.”


Bringing It Back to the People with Rep. Tupola – Health – Feb. 2015

Representative Andria Tupola discusses legislative health issues with Keola Beale, MD, Hematology and Oncology Specialist  and Craig Nakatsuka, MD, Continuing Care Specialist

The views expressed by Drs. Beale and Nakatsuka are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Kaiser Permanente or Hawaii Permanente Medical Group.


Left to right: Craig Nakatsuka, MD, Continuing Care Specialist, Representative Andria Tupola and

Keola Beale, MD, Hematology and Oncology Specialist


Rep. Bob McDermott addresses H.B. 459 – Comprehensive Sex Education

Report Title:  Women’s Legislative Caucus Package; Comprehensive Sex Education
Description:  Specifies additional elements in Hawaii’s existing sexuality health education law, including additional criteria regarding implementation of sexuality health education instruction. Requires the Department of Education to provide certain types of information to the public and parents. (HB459 HD1)
Companion:  SB395
Package: None
Current Referral:  HLT, EDN

2/20/2015 H Passed Second Reading as amended in HD 1 and referred to the committee(s) on EDN with Representative(s) Fukumoto Chang, Har, Jordan, Matsumoto, Oshiro, Pouha, Tupola, Ward voting aye with reservations; Representative(s) McDermott voting no (1) and Representative(s) Ito excused (1).

HB 459 McdermottContact:

Excerpt from Capital TV

Rep. Thielen Cynthia gives the “Hawaiian Word of the Day” Ahonui

In the Hawaii House of Representatives, Representative Cynthia Thielen gives  the “Hawaiian Word of the Day” Ka Hua `Ōlelo o Ka Lā – Hawaiian Word of the Day
(ah hoe new ee)
Definition from the Hawaiian Dictionary, Mary K. Pukui, Samuel H. Elbert:
patience, patient, enduring, long suffering, to tolerate.
The Literal meaning is “great breath.”

Ahonui is a very special word. Being patient and tolerant is often a difficult thing to do. But isn’t it interesting how ahonui also means “long suffering “as well as the literal meaning of “great breath”. Ahonui is a reminder that when we are faced with situations and people who have challenged our patience and tolerance, we must take a great breath and reflect on why we are feeling impatient or intolerant. A deep breath, the ha – our breath of life will remind us that we are all one, so we must be ahonui with others as well as ourselves.


Excerpt from Capitol TV

Rep. Gene Ward addresses HB 169 Transient Accommodations Tax; Increase

Report Title:  Transient Accommodations Tax; Increase; Resort Time Share Vacation Units
Description:  Amends the definition of fair market rental value. Increases the transient accommodations tax imposed on resort time share vacation units by 1 per cent each year to gradually achieve a rate of 9.25 per cent of the fair market rental value. (HB169 HD1)
Package: None
Current Referral:  TOU, FIN
Introducer(s): LUKE

2/19/2015 H Passed Second Reading as amended in HD 1 and referred to the committee(s) on FIN with Representative(s) Ward voting aye with reservations; Representative(s) McDermott voting no (1) and Representative(s) Oshiro, Souki excused (2).


Excerpt from Capitol TV